More revelations have
arisen in a short span! But the latest news round-up is - Four banks that have
extended loans to Financial Technologies (FTIL) have appealed to the high court
to allow them to oppose the Ministry of Corporate Affairs’ (MCA) order to merge
NSEL with FTIL, the parent company.
Times may have been
turbulent for many in the recent past - for myriad businesses and
organisations, yet some may still survive, if they are allowed to, given their
credentials, growth and their commitment to protect their shareholders,
investors, employees and, of course, the economy’s growth, to which they
contribute, directly and indirectly.
According to the news that
featured in Business Standard on January
24, 2015, the banks have come forward, seeking court’s permission to intervene
as opposition to the government’s merger order, and they are - Syndicate Bank,
DBS Bank, Union Bank and Standard Chartered Bank. The plea was filed by them in
December, 2014; they were asked to file a detailed reply by February 4, 2015,
which happens to be the next date of hearing, by the high court.
The whole episode got
flared up by the government’s order on the recommendation by the Forward
Markets Commission (FMC) and the department of economic affairs. In the
hearings, the outcome has been status quo thus far, as per the high court’s
discretion, until it hears the arguments from both sides that are for and
opposed to the merger order.
On occasions, FTIL has
said that the idea is unsettling and uncalled-for, as the defaults of the
subsidiary wing would be transferred to FTIL, which will have an adverse impact
on it, specifically, affecting its shareholders’ interests and stakes. Also,
several of the media vents and news agencies through their mouth pieces have
voiced it out time and again, and it reverberates yet again.
Highhandedness of several
will have only remnants from devastation to offer to people and future
investors. Yet diligent, upright organisations will eke out a living. The only
tenable elements would be the mettle to subsist, truthfulness to stand strong;
indomitability and intent to protect numberless interests of shareholders,
investors, employees and the economy at large.
It would, undeniably, be
more unnerving if one had to imagine emasculation of a healthily burgeoning
company, and the liabilities imposed on its investors that may have not
invested for it. The tumbling impact of this would have steamrollers run on
countless aspirations.
No comments:
Post a Comment